Should Contracting Officers generally provide for full and open competition unless exceptions apply?

The principle that Contracting Officers should generally provide for full and open competition is fundamental in federal procurement. This approach promotes fairness, transparency, and access for all qualified suppliers, ensuring that the government receives the best value for its expenditures. Full and open competition encourages innovation and enables the government to benefit from the best products and services available in the market.

Exceptions to this principle exist and are typically based on specific circumstances outlined in regulations, such as limited availability of goods or services, urgent requirements, or sole source situations. However, these are intended to be used sparingly and only when justified, reinforcing the norm that competition is the default approach.

By adhering to this standard, Contracting Officers help foster a competitive environment which can lead to better pricing, quality, and service options, ultimately benefiting public interest and effective use of taxpayer money.